CoWriter and Google Read and Write
CoWriter is a program that has been around for a number of years, but has really evolved over time and is now as user-friendly and accessible as ever. CoWriter has always had fantastic word prediction, but it was not as accessible as it was only accessible on certain computers in the school (often the resource room). Now, CoWriter Universal is available on the iPad and as an extension on Google Chrome. It can easily be used anywhere you have access to the internet. If you are using CoWriter on the iPad, it is easier to use the app rather than the Chrome Browser. However, students can easily export finished documents to your Google Drive and/or email them to their teacher.
Google Read and Write is an extension on the Chrome Browser and easily can read anything on your web browser. It, like Cowriter has a word prediction. It also can support learners in generating and outline or graphic organizer.
CoWriter and the Google Read and Write extension can be used individually, or in conjunction. You many have some students who would have difficulty with using the two, but in the average junior or senior high classroom, likely most of your students who have learned the programs can use them together.
Both CoWriter and Google Read and Write are discrete assistive technology tools that support writing. It is important to see what works best for your students. We shouldn't get locked into one specific type of technology. (Bates, 11.7.3) It is important to evaluate and keep an open mind, while also balancing the needs of your learners.
If you are looking for more information, the following videos provide a good overview and visuals to support the information.
Google Read and Write
Google Read and Write is an extension on the Chrome Browser and easily can read anything on your web browser. It, like Cowriter has a word prediction. It also can support learners in generating and outline or graphic organizer.
CoWriter and the Google Read and Write extension can be used individually, or in conjunction. You many have some students who would have difficulty with using the two, but in the average junior or senior high classroom, likely most of your students who have learned the programs can use them together.
Both CoWriter and Google Read and Write are discrete assistive technology tools that support writing. It is important to see what works best for your students. We shouldn't get locked into one specific type of technology. (Bates, 11.7.3) It is important to evaluate and keep an open mind, while also balancing the needs of your learners.
If you are looking for more information, the following videos provide a good overview and visuals to support the information.
Get the CoWriter:Universal Extension:
Get the Read and Write Extension:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/readwrite-for-google-chro/inoeonmfapjbbkmdafoankkfajkcphgd
Evaluations:
CoWriter:Universal
ENGAGEMENT
| |
| X |
The app gives a good first impression (graphics, ease of use, etc.)
|
| X |
The app is intuitive
|
| X |
The app opens up new ways to learn
|
DEVELOPMENTAL APPROPRIATENESS
| |
| X |
The user interface is age appropriate
|
| NA |
The subject matter appeals to the intended audience
|
| X |
The design matter appeals to the intended audience
|
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
| |
The app aligns with your learning goals for your students
| |
| X |
The app has a specific purpose
|
The app builds on skills and guides the student
| |
| X |
The app offers personalized or adaptive features that are based on a student’s skill level
|
There are relevant opportunities for feedback, assessment, and reflection
| |
MOTIVATION
| |
The learning content in the app is the right level for your students
| |
Gaming principles are used
| |
The methods used to motivate align with your learning goals
| |
The motivational potential exceeds the potential for distraction
| |
ACCESSIBILITY
| |
| X |
The app includes a range of levels for a variety of users with differing skill levels
|
| X |
The app supports multiple learning modalities
|
OTHER
| |
Price: 4.99 (*HRCE will pay for students who require this tool)
| |
Intended Age Group/Audience: upper elementary and junior high
| |
Google Read and Write
ENGAGEMENT
| |
| X |
The app gives a good first impression (graphics, ease of use, etc.)
|
| X |
The app is intuitive
|
| X |
The app opens up new ways to learn
|
DEVELOPMENTAL APPROPRIATENESS
| |
| X |
The user interface is age appropriate
|
The subject matter appeals to the intended audience
| |
| X |
The design matter appeals to the intended audience
|
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
| |
The app aligns with your learning goals for your students
| |
| X |
The app has a specific purpose
|
The app builds on skills and guides the student
| |
| X |
The app offers personalized or adaptive features that are based on a student’s skill level
|
There are relevant opportunities for feedback, assessment, and reflection
| |
MOTIVATION
| |
The learning content in the app is the right level for your students
| |
Gaming principles are used
| |
The methods used to motivate align with your learning goals
| |
The motivational potential exceeds the potential for distraction
| |
ACCESSIBILITY
| |
| X |
The app includes a range of levels for a variety of users with differing skill levels
|
| X |
The app supports multiple learning modalities
|
OTHER
| |
*HRCE will pay for students who require this tool)
| |
Intended Age Group/Audience: upper elementary, junior, and high school
| |
References:
Bates, T. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. British Columbia: SFU Document Solutions.
Comments
Post a Comment